aruan: (Default)
[personal profile] aruan
I called a spade a spade here because that's what I saw. It wasn't a case of well-intentioned but ultimately bad fanfiction - the way I saw it, it was a deliberately bad-faith and half-hearted (if that) effort to do something that was supposed to bring another person joy while keeping in mind that the same was being done for you. It was ill-intentioned and it *hurt* people and I don't feel unjustified for having said something about it, nor do I feel any of what I said has been in error, considering the source material.

That's as succinct as I can make it.

Date: December 26th, 2002 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popfantastic.livejournal.com
It was ill-intentioned and it *hurt* people and I don't feel unjustified for having said something about it, nor do I feel any of what I said has been in error, considering the source material.

Good. Dude, Happy Holidays, and many cookies to you (a few extra for the ego, and can I maybe fold out that couch for you both...), because wow. Wow. My eyes have lodged themselves in the back of my head at this point. I may be Grinchy, but clearly Christmas left people long on overseriousness and short on things to use as a shady excuse to launch flimsy personal attacks, because I haven't seen that sort of unexpectedly negative mudslinging on such a teeny tiny pretense in ages. Even if I disagreed with you/denied your right to complain about it (which clearly I don't, and the incredible prescient talents that lead me to predict such occurrences as the ones that upset you are what keep me far, far away from Santa projects in any fandom [well, that and their innate Christiassumptivity], but that's my personal choice and doesn't make the occurrences themselves any less comment-worthy), I let people screw up in my estimation four, five times before I start insulting their mamas! Or, you know. Start making sweeping -- and, based upon my mo' bigger experience with you than they have, very wrong -- generalizations about their personalities.

PS - calling something a kerfuffle does so make it cute. Try it! "Kerfufflers! Aww, wook at da wittle kerfufflers..."

Date: December 26th, 2002 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clarinetkate.livejournal.com
Nia, I have told you that you're my hero, right?

Date: December 26th, 2002 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popfantastic.livejournal.com
I'd make an awful hero, but you haven't even heard me talk about the story I presume is in question here! Because in my ever-objective and always tactfully stated opinion, I would have to deem it "that bad." If indeed I am presuming correctly. If not, that just goes to show you. There's more than one! They're massing for an attack!

Date: December 26th, 2002 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gjstruthseeker.livejournal.com
I refuse to link it because one, it's not terribly important for all to know who the author was, nor that I said the things I said about them, public forum or not; two, my opinion about the story is neither wavering nor unconfirmed and I don't feel it's necessary to drag it through the mud with others whose opinions I frankly couldn't care less about; and three, I don't want my friend to get involved in this. She prefers to remain anonymous and diplomatic.

So much for the latter, eh?

Date: December 26th, 2002 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popfantastic.livejournal.com
*nod* I was just going with my assumption, because the facts are, in this case, irrelevant, as there *are* enough "that bad" stories out in the universe before this conversation even begins.

Also, it has the bonus side effect of making lots of people totally paranoid that we're talking about them, oh my god, now they're going to have to never write again because of our opinions and then they'll tumble down the abyss of writelessness that as we all know causes total creative malaise leading to deep personal despair, followed by depression, substance abuse, and ultimately suicide -- for which we will be directly responsible. And to think, it could all have been cleared up if someone'd just said, "No, honey, we were talking about that other awful story." And I enjoy a good power trip ending in a needless death as much as the next girl.

Date: December 26th, 2002 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gjstruthseeker.livejournal.com
Heh. I always claim I'm evil, but now I can feel justified.

Why yes, that did make me sing. Guess which part. ;)

Date: December 26th, 2002 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clarinetkate.livejournal.com
only one? surely that cannot be the case.

I am, in fact, quite sure this is not the case. I, too, am a paragon of tact, apparently.

Date: December 26th, 2002 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gjstruthseeker.livejournal.com
The line is getting old, but I love you more dearly than words can express. Some writer I am, huh? ;)

Heh. Me and my ego, we're okay. Merriest of a holiday season to you, even if it's been (but isn't this a perennial fact) unjustifiably rollercoaster-esque so far.

Christiassumptivity. I am *so* writing Merriam-Webster as we speak.

Seriously though, *thank you.* I didn't think what I said warranted mud, but apparently I should go back for a refresher course to hone my diplomacy skills. You and the aforementioned friend put it ever so much better in a few paragraphs than the myriad comments I've spent eight hours or so formulating.

"Kerfufflers! Aww, wook at da wittle kerfufflers..."

LMAO here. I like your attitude. I think I'll get over this 'seriousness' streak of mine for the New Year and actively find everything amusing first, then try and see if it has actual merit.

*hugs you more* Mmm, cookies...

Date: December 26th, 2002 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popfantastic.livejournal.com
The line is getting old, but I love you more dearly than words can express. Some writer I am, huh? ;)

Sure, but you're a journalist...so I know it must be factual!

Seriously though, *thank you.* I didn't think what I said warranted mud, but apparently I should go back for a refresher course to hone my diplomacy skills. You and the aforementioned friend put it ever so much better in a few paragraphs than the myriad comments I've spent eight hours or so formulating.

As you found (I wasn't sure that you had), I sincerely doubt it was a matter of warranted mud so much as a group of people who undertake to study other people's mud as past-time or profession (mudology -- make no mistake, I do think it's all very well and good on its own) and then from time to time cock their heads at the indigenous people they're observing, say, "Aye, Marge, d'you suppose it's against ethics if we contaminate the field with our own, much muddier mud? Surely not!" and just heap piles of the stuff all over before wandering away in search of some other natives to hassle. The group dynamics involved are of particular interest to mudologistologists such as myself.

LMAO here. I like your attitude. I think I'll get over this 'seriousness' streak of mine for the New Year and actively find everything amusing first, then try and see if it has actual merit.

Nothing wrong with a little seriousity. It's the overseriousness that's fatal, and I've seen that before. You are not it.

Date: December 26th, 2002 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gjstruthseeker.livejournal.com
Sure, but you're a journalist...so I know it must be factual!

Fifty-point fact error otherwise. Them's the rules of the game. Though you'd think with all this, I'd have it easier there.

Glad to provide your "mudologistologist" side with something to muse and ponder over. So long as all of this big, convoluted mess had a point somewhere.

Profile

aruan: (Default)
Eva

April 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 10:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios